The English version has not yet been audited. Please use it for reference only.

Chapter 1, Part II: Map of the Metaphysical Frontier

The threefold division developed in the first half of this chapter—category mismatch, failure of predication, and unresolved questions—can be combined with the list of commitments, the frontier band, and the wilderness of the sixty-two views to form a single map. Read it from the inside outward. The two central rings contain positions explicitly affirmed and cosmographic pictures used without argument. The gray frontier band holds matters that lie partly inside and partly outside: predication concerning nibbāna without remainder, the four imponderables, and the ontological status of the cosmography. Four gates represent the undeclared questions, drawn in three different forms according to what makes them unanswerable: a single wall marks category mismatch, a double wall marks the failure of predication, and a dashed wall marks an open question. A short version of each question and a badge recording the number of alternatives in the lists of fourteen and ten appear in text boxes outside the circle. Beyond the gates, the wilderness is divided into camps following the Brahmajāla Sutta, each facing the gate most closely related to it. A mesh covers the whole wilderness, marking the genealogical diagnosis: views arise through feeling conditioned by contact, craving conditioned by feeling, and clinging conditioned by craving. Doctrines of causeless arising and annihilationism also receive symbols of refutation, each connected by a line to dependent arising.

The map below is interactive. Hover for an explanation. Leader lines connect longer notes to text boxes outside the circle. Hovering or clicking highlights both a node and its text box; clicking pins the highlight. For print, use the summary table on this page.

Affirmed position (solid) Instrumental picture (hollow) Suspended at the frontier (gray, dashed) Gate of the undeclared ✕ Refuted by dependent arising: causelessness and annihilationism Net of views = genealogical diagnosis: contact → feeling → craving → clinging to views Question summaries and alternative counts appear in boxes outside each gate

Summary Table

Region Item Explanation Textual basis
Affirmed core Four Truths Master outline: all other commitments elaborate them Discourse on Turning the Dhamma Wheel
Affirmed core Dependent arising A law that stands; refutes causelessness and annihilationism and genealogically diagnoses all views SĀ 296; Kaccānagotta Sutta; Brahmajāla Sutta
Affirmed core Impermanence The perishing of conditioned phenomena, one of the three characteristics Common to the early collections
Affirmed core Not-self No enduring self is found in aggregates, sense fields, or elements; a tension line runs to the life–body gate Discourse on the Characteristic of Not-Self
Affirmed core Kamma and result Moral causation without a controller; details of ripening remain at the frontier Cūḷakammavibhaṅga Sutta
Affirmed core Rebirth Continuity across lives is affirmed; its supporting picture sits in the instrumental ring Common to the early collections
Affirmed core Nibbāna as the unconditioned Straddles the line: existential affirmation remains inside the wall (with remainder); questions of predication fall outside it (without remainder) Udāna 8.3; Itivuttaka 44
Instrumental picture Three realms A stratified cosmos mirroring the jhāna sequence, used without argument Common to the early collections
Instrumental picture Six destinations The popular terrain of rebirth Devadūta Sutta and others
Instrumental picture Devas Present throughout the texts without an established ontology Discourses of the Dīgha Nikāya
Instrumental picture Jhāna sequence An affirmed practical ladder; see Chapter 5 for its correspondence with the three realms Common to the early collections
Frontier suspension Ontological status of the cosmography Teaching device or literal map? The texts do not ask (Chapter 5) Part 13, Chapter 5
Frontier suspension Four imponderables Buddha-range, jhāna-range, ripening of kamma, and world-speculation: a warning line around thought AN 4.77
Frontier suspension Predicating nibbāna without remainder Nibbāna with remainder is reachable within worldly phenomena; without remainder has no positive relation to them, so predication fails Itivuttaka 44; SN 44
Gate of the undeclared (14: four / 10: two) Time: world eternal or not eternal Category mismatch: treating time as an object with intrinsic properties Cūḷamāluṅkya Sutta; Poṭṭhapāda Sutta
Gate of the undeclared (14: four / 10: two) Space: world finite or infinite The same category mismatch as the time gate Cūḷamāluṅkya Sutta; related SĀ discourses
Gate of the undeclared (14: four / 10: four) Tathāgata after death: exists or does not exist Failure of predication: the domain of nibbāna without remainder is not governed by predication (double wall) Aggivacchagotta Sutta; SN 22.86
Gate of the undeclared (14: two / 10: two) Life and body: same or different Open question: never cast into fourfold form; a question of personal identity Cūḷamāluṅkya Sutta; SN 44
Sixty-two views (4) Eternalism Limited recollection presented as an unlimited conclusion Brahmajāla Sutta
Sixty-two views (4) Partial eternalism Both eternal and not eternal; Great Brahmā imagines himself the creator Brahmajāla Sutta
Sixty-two views (4) Finitude and infinity All four permutations receive hard answers in the wilderness Brahmajāla Sutta
Sixty-two views (4) Endless equivocation Cowardly evasion, the inverse mirror of principled nondeclaration Brahmajāla Sutta
Sixty-two views (2, refuted) Causelessness Directly refuted by dependent arising, while remaining inside the diagnostic net Brahmajāla Sutta; discourses on dependent arising
Sixty-two views (16) Percipient after death The largest family of theories about postmortem states Brahmajāla Sutta
Sixty-two views (8) Nonpercipient after death A nonpercipient self after death Brahmajāla Sutta
Sixty-two views (8) Neither percipient nor nonpercipient The fourfold format mirrored in the wilderness Brahmajāla Sutta
Sixty-two views (7, refuted) Annihilationism The Kaccānagotta Sutta uses dependent arising to avoid both annihilationism and eternalism Brahmajāla Sutta; Kaccānagotta Sutta
Sixty-two views (5) Nibbāna here and now The earliest attempt to pull nibbāna back within predication Brahmajāla Sutta

Notes on the Map

Each camp in the wilderness is positioned according to the gate with which its subject is most closely related. The radius of each camp is scaled to the square root of its number of views. Causelessness and annihilationism are marked as refuted rather than undeclared because neither was set aside: dependent arising directly rejects them. “When this exists, that comes to be” rejects causelessness; the Kaccānagotta Sutta uses dependent arising to avoid the extremes of annihilationism and eternalism. Endless equivocation occupies the high ground outside the gates to contrast cowardly evasion with principled nondeclaration. The mesh covering the entire wilderness marks the genealogical diagnosis at the end of the Brahmajāla Sutta: all views are conditioned by contact. It diagnoses views as symptoms rather than contests them as propositions. The map stands or falls with the first half of the chapter, whose prose governs its interpretation. The interactive version supports close reading online; in print, the summary table is authoritative.