Oldenberg 编译《The Dīpavaṃsa》（Williams and Norgate, 1879）
书页
导论第 9 页
核查结论
Oldenberg 导论第 9 页给出断代的四条依据与结论：「The result is, that the Dīpavaṃsa … was written between the beginning of the fourth and the first third of the fifth century」（下限据《小史》所记 Dhātusena（459–477）令于摩哂陀像前岁时公诵《岛史》，上限据其叙事止于 302 年），正文作「约公元四世纪成文」在此区间之内；同页并据文体判《岛史》先于《大史》，与正文「《大史》约五至六世纪、马哈那摩编定」的次序相合。
Oldenberg 编译《The Dīpavaṃsa》（Williams and Norgate, 1879）
书页
书内第 204 页（XVIII 1）书内第 142 页（V 51–52）
核查结论
②V.51–52 数部派则作「Seventeen are the heretical sects, and there is one orthodox sect… The most excellent Theravāda … is the complete doctrine of the Jina」，列十八部时用的是「上座部」，不是「分别说」。两处合看，分别说在锡兰传统里是正统的自称与判教语，不是十八部名单上可点名的一部，正与 Geiger「与其说是某个特定部派，不如说是一种哲学倾向」及正文已落实的写法相合。
按
①岛上比丘通称「holders of the Vibhajja doctrine」；②数十八部时正统一系作 Theravāda，不作 Vibhajjavāda。两处合看，分别说是自称与判教语，非名单上的部派。
柯林斯自陈与肖朋同向见该文注三：「The general tenor of the re-evaluation I am recommending here is very much in line with the work being produced by Gregory Schopen, who has shown that for so many things either not found or not emphasised in the Canon, and usually seen as ‘later’ developments, there is in fact extensive evidence in the earliest archaeological and epigraphical remains」——其用力方向确是改由碑铭与考古来裁。
柯林斯自陈与肖朋同向见该文注三：「The general tenor of the re-evaluation I am recommending here is very much in line with the work being produced by Gregory Schopen, who has shown that for so many things either not found or not emphasised in the Canon, and usually seen as ‘later’ developments, there is in fact extensive evidence in the earliest archaeological and epigraphical remains」——其用力方向确是改由碑铭与考古来裁。四料简那次档案检验见第三卷第十一篇第三章，本书站内互指。
「最接近不等于接近」是方法的界限声明，由对勘只能定幸存者之先后这一点直接推出。「巴利本并非处处更古」见 Anālayo《A Comparative Study of the Majjhima-nikāya》导论所述工序：差异「are then discussed in terms of their possible historical causes: sectarian doctrinal slant, the vicissitudes of oral transmission, insertion of commentarial material, translation errors,
核查全文
and so on. Where possible, a judgement is then made on which of the versions is most likely to have accurately preserved this or that component of the message」——判归哪一本是逐案的，不预设巴利本胜出。肖朋一轴之别（实践与教法）为本书的分梳， Schopen《Figments and Fragments》可参。
两项各有其据。①两套七论：Dhammajoti《Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma》书内第 1 页「we are now in possession of only two complete sets: the seven texts of the Theravāda preserved in Pāli, and the seven Sarvāstivāda texts in Chinese translation」（书影 `dhammajoti-001`）。②界线划在遣使之前：Frauwallner《Studies in Abhidharma Literature》书内第 124
核查全文
–125 页「Since both schools have a common core in the old, basic stock of their Abhidharma, it is obvious that this core predates the missions and was thus brought to the mission countries as a common heritage. It is, however, equally obvious that the development and transformations of the doctrines we are here dealing with, while treating the same problems, attempt quite different solutions and represent individual developments in the respective [schools]」（书影 `frauwallner-124`）。论母之法在经藏内已见（《长部·集异门经》DN 33）与本书对论藏的分层判断，见 2.2、2.5，本行站内回指。
按
现存完整的正典阿毗达磨只有两套：「we are now in possession of only two complete sets: the seven texts of the Theravāda preserved in Pāli, and the seven Sarvāstivāda texts in Chinese translation.」同页并指出「the study of these mātṛkā-s had served as a major basis for the development of the abhidharma-piṭaka」，与正文「论母之为方法，经藏里就有现成的样子」相发明。
Studies in Abhidharma Literature and the Origins of Buddhist Philosophical Systems - Erich Frauwallner - State University of New York Press 1995
书页
书内第 124 页
核查结论
两项各有其据。①两套七论：Dhammajoti《Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma》书内第 1 页「we are now in possession of only two complete sets: the seven texts of the Theravāda preserved in Pāli, and the seven Sarvāstivāda texts in Chinese translation」（书影 `dhammajoti-001`）。②界线划在遣使之前：Frauwallner《Studies in Abhidharma Literature》书内第 124
核查全文
–125 页「Since both schools have a common core in the old, basic stock of their Abhidharma, it is obvious that this core predates the missions and was thus brought to the mission countries as a common heritage. It is, however, equally obvious that the development and transformations of the doctrines we are here dealing with, while treating the same problems, attempt quite different solutions and represent individual developments in the respective [schools]」（书影 `frauwallner-124`）。论母之法在经藏内已见（《长部·集异门经》DN 33）与本书对论藏的分层判断，见 2.2、2.5，本行站内回指。
按
弗劳瓦尔纳把界线划在阿育王遣使之前：「Since both schools have a common core in the old, basic stock of their Abhidharma, it is obvious that this core predates the missions and was thus brought to the mission countries as a common heritage.」下句紧接「It is, however, equally obvious that the development and transformations ... attempt quite different solutions and represent individual developments」，正文「核心方法早出、成体系的七论晚出」两句由此分承。
Geiger 译本第三十六章：国王「Suppressing the Vetulya-doctrine and keeping heretics in check by his minister Kapila, he made the true doctrine to shine forth in glory」——王压制方广（Vetulya）之说、以大臣迦毗罗禁抑异见；但正文所断为全称命题：「巴利三藏是唯一权威，注释传统是唯一合法诠释，外来的大乘或其他学说一律视为污染」——数起排斥个案不能证成「唯一」「一律」；且大寺自身亦有注疏与纲要之作，其权威结构非仅三藏一层。
核对：期刊名、卷期、起讫页码（61–93）与正文著录逐字相合（TOC「Theravāda in History Peter Skilling 61」，末页页眉「Skilling: Theravāda in History 93」）。此条挂在「延伸阅读」下，不backing 正文任何具体论断，只需书目本身准确，今已核实。判确。
按
三图合证延伸阅读的完整著录：Pacific World 第三系列第 11 期、2009 年秋；Peter Skilling〈Theravāda in History〉首页为 61，末页页眉仍见篇题且页码为 93。本卡只核书目及起讫页，不以该文承担正文的其他断语。
The tradition recorded in the Sinhalese chronicles states that the Theravādin canon was written down……as a result of threats to the Saṅgha from famine, war, and the growing power of the Abhayagiri vihāra。
Gunawardana《Robe and Plough》今日，逐字坐实：「Mahatissa, for whom Vaṭṭagāmaṇi built the Abhayagiri monastery, was accused by the monks of the Mahavihara of a breach of discipline and consequently was expelled from the Order」——先被大寺以戒律违失为由驱逐，国王后建无畏山寺予之，与正文「此前曾被大寺的僧团以戒律违失为由驱逐」「国王此举等于以王权庇护了一个被僧团判决过的人」逐字对应。判确。
「三寺」坐标找到了，三处散在原文不同段落，此前几轮通检没连起来看：無畏（山）「山有五千僧」；支提（無畏精舍東四十里）「可有二千僧」；摩訶毘呵羅（城南七里）「有三千僧住」。5000+2000+3000＝恰好一万，与正文「三所大寺，住僧加起来超过万人」逐字对上。「住岛两年」（法顯住此國二年）、所得文献（彌沙塞律藏本、長阿含、雜阿含、一部雜藏）同段原文俱在。James Legge 1886 英译未用上也无妨，直接核对的是原文本身。判确，脚注不必改。
78.13「Many began departing to foreign lands, others left the Order」、78.19「the undisciplined he excluded from the Order」、78.20「assigned them lucrative positions」同页可核。
），所取平行本「include not only discourses contained in the Chinese Āgamas, but also individual Chinese translations, Tibetan translations, fragmentary Sanskrit remains, and some quotations」——括注三项逐一相符。
[0437] Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma - K. L. Dhammajoti - 2009
书页
書 1（版心页 1，第一章 Abhidharma 首页）
核查结论
版权页作「First Edition: Colombo 2002 … Fourth Revised Edition: Hong Kong 2009；Published in Hong Kong by Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong 2009；ISBN 978-988-99296-5-7」，与著录逐项相符；所引原句见书内第 1 页。
按
引文與页次本面开卷核过（該本）。版权页（一带）并作 First Edition: Colombo 2002／Second Revised Edition: Colombo 2004／Third Revised and Enlarged Edition: Hong Kong 2007／Fourth Revised Edition: Hong Kong 2009；Published in Hong Kong by Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong；ISBN 978-988-99296-5-7——與注中著录「4th ed. Hong Kong: Centre of Buddhist Studies, University of Hong Kong, 2009」逐项相符。
[0462] Studies in Abhidharma Literature and the Origins of Buddhist Philosophical Systems - Erich Frauwallner - State University of New York Press 1995
[0462] Studies in Abhidharma Literature and the Origins of Buddhist Philosophical Systems - Erich Frauwallner - State University of New York Press 1995
