[0524] The Buddhist Conquest of China - Erik Zürcher - 2007
书页
书内第 219 页
核查结论
Getz〈T'ien-t'ai Pure Land Societies and the Creation of the Pure Land Patriarchate〉已随《Buddhism in the Sung》（Gregory 與 Getz 編，Kuroda Institute/Hawai'i Press, 1999），即该书第十二章（書477–523，）。脚注所称「白莲社叙事与慧远初祖地位的宋代建构」一说坐实，且可精确到人、到年、到书： 「The Pure Land patriarchate was the creation of the two T'ien-t'ai figur
核查全文
es of the Southern Sung period: Tsung-hsiao (1151–1214) and Chih-p'an (fl. 1258–1269). In 1199, Tsung-hsiao compiled an anthology of Pure Land materials titled Compendium of the Land of Bliss (Le-pang wen-lei). In the section of this work dedicated to biographies, Tsung-hsiao introduced six figures whom he identified as patriarchs of the Lotus Society (Lien-she)」；又「the creation of a Pure Land patriarchate by Buddhist historians of the Southern Sung period played a formative role in promoting the conception of Pure Land as an independent reality」。 一处可加精度：Getz 系之于南宋（宗晓1199年《乐邦文类》、志磐 fl.1258–1269），正文只作「宋代」，不误而稍宽，若欲更准可作「南宋」并举宗晓、志磐二人。Zürcher 一侧（402年庐山共誓）先已核。判语改「确」。
为「Chapter 12 T'ien-t'ai Pure Land Societies and the Creation of the Pure Land Patriarchate DANIEL A. GETZ, JR.」，章题与本注所署逐字相同，起讫（477–523）与件之著录相符。书内 479 页明言二家：「assigning the title of Lotus Society to their patriarchal lists, both Tsung-hsiao and Chih-p'an were reflecting not only the importance of Pure Land societies within Sung Buddhism but also the crucial role that the T'ien-t'ai school had played」——宗晓与志磐并举，正是本注所谓「宋代白莲社叙事与净土祖统的建构」。书内 478 页并作「This patriarchate, once posited, contributed to the mistaken perception that Pure Land was transmitted within an autonomous, continuous lineage and therefore constituted a tradition in its own right」——本注「不作连续师承」一语，Getz 说得更重，径称连续法脉之说为误认。 （四）一项未能实检：「印光被列为第十三祖出现在其身后纪念与传记材料中」，所据当为二十世纪的纪念与传记材料，非上列三种所能担；亦未见。此项属本注末一句，不动前三项之判，记此以志范围。
