核实的：①座主制——Jaini 书内第 307 页记中世纪寺院化之后另生一层「administrator-clerics」，「not only managed the temple and its associated holdings (schools, libraries, extensive areas of land) but also assumed control of the temple rituals」，天衣派此辈出自 kṣullaka 而称 bhaṭṭāraka，白衣派对应者称 caityavāsī 或 yati，「In both sects the administrator-clerics functioned as the effective governing bodies of their communities」——正文「承接寺产与社群」由此承担。
核查全文
②裸形僧团二十世纪复兴——Dundas 书内第 181 页「the revived Digambara ascetic body, taking its lead from the great Ācārya Śāntisāgara who performed sallekhana in 1955」；书内第 185 页记其生于 1873 年，四十七岁（约 1920 年）方于 Yarnāl 受具、舍腰布拔发。③一时一位阿阇黎的集中制与继任由前任指定——Dundas 书内第 259 页：教权尽归阿阇黎一身，「It is the acarya alone who is responsible for the administration of discipline, for the appointment of his successor, for the giving of initiation」。④天衣派不受白衣派圣典——Jaini 书内第 4–5 页记南归僧团见 Sthūlabhadra 所定结集本，「not only declared the entire canon heretical and invalid」。对不上的三项：〔一〕创派年份。正文作「一七六〇年」，两书皆无此数：Dundas 书内第 255 页记 Bhikṣu（俗称 Bhikhanjī）生于 1726 年、1751 年从白衣派斯坦那迦瓦西阿阇黎 Raghunāthjī 出家，第 256 页记其 1759 年断食次（saṃbhoga）正式脱离并自行再受戒，第 259 页记「the full community was formally constituted in 1764」。已改：正文第 15 行与脚注均改作「一七五九年脱出、一七六四年立宗」。〔二〕传承任数。正文作「至今十一任」，Dundas（2002）作「Of the nine acaryas who have succeeded Bhiksu」，即连 Bhikṣu 共十任，其时在位者为第十任 Mahāprajña（Tulsī 之继）；Mahāśramaṇa 二〇一〇年继位为第十一任，已在两书成书之后。已改：正文不再列任数，只作「历任阿阇黎由前任指定、井然相继」；脚注改作「至 Dundas 二〇〇二年著书时凡十任（Bhikṣu 之下九传），其时在位者为 Tulsī 之继 Mahāprajña」。Mahāśramaṇa 二〇一〇年继为第十一任一事已删——非两书所能承担，日后有二〇一〇年后的出处时可复补。又，Dundas 未给 Tulsī 排序，故脚注亦不排。〔三〕断绝的年代。正文作「中世纪出家世系近断」，Dundas 书内第 184 页把塌陷放得晚得多：天衣派裸形僧团「can be said to have been all but obliterated by the nineteenth century, with the evidence suggesting that the numbers of naked ascetics had started to go into serious decline from the seventeenth century」。Jaini 所记座主制取代确在中世纪，但「近断」是十七至十九世纪的事。已改：正文作「自中世纪起就让位给……座主（bhaṭṭāraka）制度……裸形行者到十九世纪几乎绝迹，迟至二十世纪初才复兴」；脚注并补 Śāntisāgara 的生卒与受具之年，以坐实「二十世纪初」。
