前记所悬「蒂博曾诊治戒酒协会创始人之一，为传记事实而非出自所引三文（Wilson、founder、co-founder 三词通检三篇皆零命中）」今有据，且所诊治者可标实名。「became a close friend and supporter of Bill W.」；「When Bill W. experienced difficulties with depression in the 1940s, he sought and received psychiatric treatment from Dr. Tiebout」；又记其生于 1896 年 1 月 2 日于布鲁克林，1966 年七月 Bill W. 在 A.A. Grapevine 撰悼文称其 well-beloved friend。并补上列二句为出处。判疑→确，处置待件→已更新。
[0025] A Rumor of Angels Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural - Peter L. Berger - 1969
原文
By a cognitive minority I mean a group of people whose view of the world differs significantly from the one generally taken for granted in their society
字句
正文论“cognitive minority”处（电子书无固定版心页码）
版本
电子书无原书页码。上图只呈证句，命中处标黄；它不证明固定页码。读者可在同一版本中按这句话检索。
核查结论
②Aronson & Mills（[0553]）首页即刊页 177，与脚注「59（1959）：177—181」合。③Iannaccone（[0733]）首页刊记「AJS Volume 99 Number 5 (March 1994): 1180-1211」，摘要「Strictness makes organizations stronger and more attractive because it reduces free riding. It screens out members who lack commitment and stimulates participation among those who remain」，正与正文「苛刻要求筛除三心二意者，反而强化留下者的投入」合。
核查全文
④Berger《A Rumor of Angels》「cognitive minority」九见，并自下定义「By a cognitive minority I mean a group of people whose view of the world differs significantly from the one generally taken for granted in their society」；《The Sacred Canopy》（[0648]）亦三见。⑤Rowatt 等（[0364]）刊记「Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41:2 (2002) 227–237」，摘要「In both studies, intrinsic religiousness was associated with an increase in the tendency to rate the self as more adherent to biblical commandments than others」，即正文「宗教内在性越高者，自评美德高出常人的幅度越大」；惟原文所比者是遵守圣经诫命的自评，正文作「美德」，稍泛而不误。⑥Festinger 等 1956（[0728]）第一章立五条件，「These five conditions specify the circumstances under which increased proselyting would be expected to follow disconfirmation」，与脚注「预言落空后信众反而强化传教」合。一处属本书引申，记此：正文谓 Berger 所论认知少数「维持信念的标准策略正是把少数处境读作『众人皆盲，我独得见』」，而 Berger 所述的维持策略是结成宗派式组织以对抗周遭（《Sacred Canopy》：「The sect … serves as the model for organizing a cognitive minority against a hostile or at least non-believing milieu」），「众人皆盲」一语是本书的转述，读作引申可，读作转引则稍过。判确，处置无需更新。
