…何漸次悟入唯識？謂諸菩薩於識相、性，資糧位中能深信解；在加行位能漸伏除所取、能取，引發真見；在通達位如實通達；修習位中如所見理，數數修習伏斷餘障；至究竟位出障圓明，能盡未來化有情類，復令悟入唯識相、性。
初資糧位，其相云何？
頌曰：
２６乃至未起識，
求住唯識性，
於二取…
本地 T0278/T0279《华严经·十地品》逐地配十波罗蜜并叙断障修行，T1585 卷九30行明说修习位“數數修習伏斷餘障”，脚注所据相合。
（二）「处处解释即不可检验」在书内第 34 页：「These theories appeared to be able to explain practically everything that happened within the fields to which they referred……Once your eyes were thus opened you saw confirming instances everywhere: the world was full of verifications of the theory. Whatever happened always confirmed it
」，而书内第 37 页第七条结论把它落成判准：「Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers—for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption……it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status」，末云「the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability」。脚注所述判据见书内第 133 页：「All scientific research programmes may be characterized by their ‘hard core’. The negative heuristic of the programme forbids us to direct the modus tollens at this ‘hard core’. Instead, we must use our ingenuity to articulate or even invent ‘auxiliary hypotheses’, which form a protective belt around this core……A research programme is successful if all this leads to a progressive problemshift; unsuccessful if it leads to a degenerating problemshift」；「Progressive and degenerating problemshifts」并为书内第 116 页的小节标题。与脚注「围绕硬核修补辅助假说的保护带是常规操作，分野在进步／退化的问题转换」全合。 两造俱齐，改判「确」。
前图「处处印证」之症状，后图第七条结论：ad hoc 补救「rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status」。
（二）「处处解释即不可检验」在书内第 34 页：「These theories appeared to be able to explain practically everything that happened within the fields to which they referred……Once your eyes were thus opened you saw confirming instances everywhere: the world was full of verifications of the theory. Whatever happened always confirmed it
」，而书内第 37 页第七条结论把它落成判准：「Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers—for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption……it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status」，末云「the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability」。脚注所述判据见书内第 133 页：「All scientific research programmes may be characterized by their ‘hard core’. The negative heuristic of the programme forbids us to direct the modus tollens at this ‘hard core’. Instead, we must use our ingenuity to articulate or even invent ‘auxiliary hypotheses’, which form a protective belt around this core……A research programme is successful if all this leads to a progressive problemshift; unsuccessful if it leads to a degenerating problemshift」；「Progressive and degenerating problemshifts」并为书内第 116 页的小节标题。与脚注「围绕硬核修补辅助假说的保护带是常规操作，分野在进步／退化的问题转换」全合。 两造俱齐，改判「确」。
硬核／保护带／进步与退化问题转换，一段俱全。此二图系逐页转正后所剪，读者若自行检索须先转正。