← 引用核查

06-格鲁派与宗喀巴

6 条 · 6 行 · 到书里读本章 →

第 108 行延伸阅读

纸本1.11.6-1条0440
所据
[0254] Introduction to Emptiness As Taught in Tsong-kha-pa's Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path - Guy Newland - undated
书页
第二章〈Following the Path of Wisdom〉(电子书无原书页码) 书影
第二章〈Following the Path of Wisdom〉(电子书无原书页码)
核查结论

书名与括注俱实,且该书自陈与括注几乎逐字相当。(一)书名对:篇首题「Introduction to Emptiness: As Taught in Tsong-kha-pa's Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path」,与书目行全同。出版者亦对(Snow Lion 十一见;书中并记《菩提道次第广论》英译全本亦 Snow Lion Publications, 2000–2004 出)。(二)「入门导读」四字有作者自道为凭:「If you are a person with some background in Buddhism but without specialized expertise in Buddhist philosophy… I have written with you in mind」;

核查全文

「My goal in this book is to bridge the gap between contemporary readers who would like to understand emptiness and Tsong-kha-pa's profound explanations… For now, we need a place to start」。(三)「宗喀巴空性诠释」亦对,且范围可写得更准:「I wrote this book mainly by summarizing and explaining in my own words key ideas and arguments that the sect's founder, Tsong-kha-pa Lo-sang-drak-pa (1357–1419), puts forward in the 'insight' section of his massive text The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path」;又谓所述为「emptiness as presented in the Ge-luk sect」。即:所据非宗喀巴全部著作,专取《广论》毘钵舍那一章。 括注若欲更准,可作「宗喀巴《广论》毘钵舍那章空性说的入门导读」。全书 Tsong-kha-pa 二百三十二见、Great Treatise 六十二见、emptiness 三百四十见、conventional 一百八十三见、Madhyamaka 七十六见、Prāsaṅgika 二十八见。(四)一条使用提示:作者自记其引《广论》「by volume number and page number」,即按 Cutler 英译本卷次页码;本书日后若引其转述之宗喀巴原文,可循此回到英译本,再回藏文本。 又,其术语从 Hopkins/Napper 一系作 intrinsic existence(intrinsic 二百三十六见)而非 inherent existence(仅二见),检索时须用前者。

原文说全书首要关切是“知空性之心”,下接说诸法唯依彼此而有。此可直接人证延伸阅读所标的“宗喀巴空性诠释入门”。

第 112 行脚注 thurman

纸本1.11.6-2条0720
所据
[0693] Tsong Khapa’s Speech of Gold in the Essence of True Eloquence - Robert A. F. Thurman (trans.) - 1984
书页
書 87(版心作 BUT I HAVE SEEN IT 87) 书影
書 87(版心作 BUT I HAVE SEEN IT 87)
核查结论

判疑转确。前记两项今皆了结。(一)年份之争已由(二)双向论证與"更清晰不迷茫"一语已拆开另标**: 今以《缘起赞》四支颂当双向论证,以《菩提道次第广论》毗钵舍那章卷十七、二十、二十三当"更清晰不迷茫"一层,并明写此二事皆不出《善说心髓》、Thurman 通检未见、故不并称;又记卷二十所引佛护论一段宗喀巴在《善说心髓》另有转述(Thurman 書 308—309,其注六五标 BMMV, I, f. 155b2-156a1 并注明 paraphrased by Tsong Khapa),是同据佛护一处而非同段引文。正文、注皆不须再动。

正文甘丹寺落成年之据(同页上文作 he assented to the building of the new monastery, on Nomad Mountain (‘Brog Ri-bo-che), and called it Ganden (dGa-ldan);该书索引亦作 Ganden Monastery, 87,可相印证。該本(偶数面版心在末行:=86、110=88)。

第 114 行脚注 tsong_lamrim

书目著录1.11.6-3条0661
所据
[1048] The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment Volume One - Tsong-kha-pa (Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee 譯) - 2000
书页
版权页
版权页

此页所载版权声明禁止以任何方式复制或传播本书的任何部分。本页书影只为核对该条著录而摆在此处,请勿转载、转贴、下载或另行传播——禁令未开「少量节取」之例,剪一小段同样不在许可之内。

核查结论

第一卷(1048,)书名页「Translated by The Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee / Joshua W. C. Cutler, Editor-in-Chief / Guy Newland, Editor / Snow Lion Publications, Ithaca, New York」,版权页「Copyright © 2000 Tibetan Buddhist Learning Center / First edition USA 2000」,编者序首句「This book is the first of a three-volume series」;

核查全文

第二卷(1049) 版权页「Copyright © 2004 Tibetan Buddhist Learning Center / First edition USA 2004」;第三卷(1050,止观卷) 版权页「Copyright © 2002 Tibetan Buddhist Learning Center / First edition USA 2002」。注中「3 vols., trans. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee. Ithaca: Snow Lion, 2000–2004」逐项俱合(三卷依次 2000、2004、2002,起讫即 2000—2004)。无需更新。

第 116 行脚注 jonang_1642

本书原文

一六四二年的政治重组,见 Matthew T. Kapstein. The Tibetan Assimilation of Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000,卷首〈A Brief Chronology of Tibetan Buddhism〉:“in 1642 Gushri Khan of the Khoshot tribe conquers all of Tibet, establishing the Fifth Dalai Lama (1617–1682) as ruler of the reunified realm”。 觉囊一侧据 Cyrus Stearns. The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999,书内第 70—74 页。该书开宗明义更正一个流行的说法:“It has generally been stated in Western works on Tibetan history that the suppression of the Jonang sect and the conversion of their monasteries to the Geluk school came about in 1658. This is only partially correct.”实为两步:一六五〇年,多罗那他所建的达丹丹却林(Dakden Damchö Ling)宗义由觉囊改为格鲁,“the point at which the Zhentong doctrine was banned at Jonang by order of the victorious Geluk authorities”;然据五世达赖自述,寺虽易主而僧未改其见行,他以铜镀金为喻,称之为只有一层格鲁外皮的觉囊,故一六五八年格鲁当局“expelled them to other monasteries, made harsher regulations concerning the Geluk conversion, and gave the monastery the new name of Genden Phuntsok Ling”,“From this time the Jonang tradition was suppressed as an independent school in Central and Western Tibet.” 政治缘由同页:多罗那他“was one of the main spiritual advisors to the rulers of Tsang province during their struggle against the Geluk powers of Central Tibet for political supremacy”。 存续一层:该书记他空与时轮之学在中藏后藏仍有暗传,而“the far eastern Amdo monastery of Dzamtang and its affiliates”成为此后觉囊传承的所在;司徒班钦一七二三年访达丹时,见其虽已为格鲁教院而旧僧未改,觉囊经版则早由中央政府下令查封。 两处须记,皆与本书原文相关。其一,本注原挂 Tsering Shakya. The Dragon in the Land of Snows: A History of Modern Tibet since 1947,该书副题已自道断限在一九四七年之后,够不着十七世纪,今删。其二, Geoffrey Samuel. Civilized Shamans(Smithsonian, 1993)書 528 亦记此事,作“The Jonangpa order was closed down altogether, its head gompa converted into a Gelugpa institution, and its printing blocks placed under seal”,并谓“some Jonangpa gompa survived in east Tibet”其所本者正是 Stearns 所要更正的那一路(Samuel 自注引 Smith 1970a),且未分一六五〇与一六五八两步,存续之地亦只泛作东藏而不指安多壤塘,故本书从 Stearns

书目著录1.11.6-4条0662
所据
[0662] The Tibetan Assimilation of Buddhism - Matthew T. Kapstein - 2000
书页
版权页
版权页

此页所载版权声明禁止以任何方式复制或传播本书的任何部分。本页书影只为核对该条著录而摆在此处,请勿转载、转贴、下载或另行传播——禁令未开「少量节取」之例,剪一小段同样不在许可之内。

核查结论

本行所缺二项今俱了断:①觉囊改宗之研究—— Stearns 一书(Jonang 三百一十八见)担之,已据以把正文改实(一六五〇與一六五八两步之年份與缘由、祖庭改宗而僧众后逐寺名后易、存续於安多壤塘及其属寺),并记一次择源之判(Samuel《Civilized Shamans》書 528 所本即 Stearns 所要更正之一路,故从专著不从通史);②Tsering Shakya 一书是否涉此早期背景——已核并已处置:该书副题自道断限在一九四七年之后,够不着十七世纪,注中已删此条。 核已毕而判语未回改,今补。判无从核→确。

第 118 行脚注 gyatso_memoir

书目著录1.11.6-5条0441
所据
Freedom in Exile The Autobiography of the Dalai Lama - Tenzin Gyatso - 1990
书页
版权页
版权页

此页所载版权声明禁止以任何方式复制或传播本书的任何部分。本页书影只为核对该条著录而摆在此处,请勿转载、转贴、下载或另行传播——禁令未开「少量节取」之例,剪一小段同样不在许可之内。

核查结论

十四世达赖自传逐项坐实:1959年流亡——全书主线,「1959」20见;达兰萨拉流亡政府——「Dharamsala」41见;1989年诺贝尔和平奖——「I learned that I had won the Nobel Prize for Peace」(1989年秋);中间道路,高度自治不求独立——书内所记即1988年斯特拉斯堡提案:「the whole of Tibet to exist in association with the People's Republic of China, with foreign affairs and limited defence directed from Peking」,是中间道路政策的直接前身,实质相合;

核查全文

与科学对话——书内自陈「I have always been open to the discoveries and truths of modern science」,惟神经科学与认知科学这一具体面向(Mind and Life 对话系列)晚于此书出版,该书未及,属该括注的细节延伸,不影响主句判定。判确。

第 122 行脚注 erdingjie

本书原文

双向论证出宗喀巴《缘起赞》(全题《由说甚深缘起门中称赞无上大师世尊善说心藏》,法尊译,大藏经补编第十册,一卷五十八颂):缘起→空一支作"由彼彼依缘,说彼彼性空,离此更何有,希有善教诲";空→用一支作"若见返彼者,空则用不成,有用则无空,堕苦恼险处";两支互成之句作"此皆自性空,缘此此果起,二决定更互无障为助伴",又"尊许若见时,空即缘起义,性空与成立作所作无违"。"真正认识空性者对缘起的显现更加清晰"一层则出《菩提道次第广论》毗钵舍那章:卷二十三"依缘起因,若能定解芽等性空,断诸歧途于心最显";卷二十引佛护论"若时了知缘起,发慧光明除愚痴暗,由智慧眼照见诸法无自性性"("暗"字法尊译本原作"闇",此处依简体本);卷十七谓于此当生定解"他莫能转"。以上所引皆不出《善说心髓》:Thurman 译本通检,《缘起赞》那四支颂与广论上引三处均无对应文字。惟卷二十所引佛护论一段,宗喀巴在《善说心髓》里另有转述,见 Thurman 译本书内第 308–309 页"how the illumination through the knowledge of relativity clears up the darkness of delusion, the intrinsic unreality of things is seen, and attraction and aversion do not arise",其注六五标作 BMMV, I, f. 155b2–156a1,并注明"paraphrased by Tsong Khapa";是同据佛护一处,而非同一段引文。故仍另标出处,不并称。

汉文原典1.11.6-6条0722
所据
B0052《緣起讚》 宗喀巴著 法尊譯
原典

…教我敬禮世所有衰損其根為無明見何能還滅是故說緣起爾時具慧者如何不了知尊聖教心要即諸緣起道如是於依怙常有稱讚門除說緣起外誰能得餘者由彼彼依緣說彼彼性空離此更何有希有善教誨愚者執何法堅固邊執縛智善彼即是戲網盡斷門此教於餘未能見故唯稱尊為大師外道竊名以飾讚如於野干呼獅子希…

坐标
B10n0052_p0108a03 段起行 · 卷 1 · 引文在其下约 5 行
核查结论

十七串引文逐字回核,全合。《緣起讚》据 B0052 文言原文,卷首自题「緣起讚由說甚深緣起門中稱讚無上大師世尊善說心藏略名緣起讚共五十八頌宗喀巴大師造民國苾蒭法尊譯」,脚注所记全题、译者、一卷五十八颂三事俱不误;「由彼彼依緣」「說彼彼性空」「離此更何有」「希有善教誨」「若見返彼者」「空則用不成」「有用則無空」「墮苦惱險處」「此皆自性空」「緣此此果起」「二決定更互無障為助伴」「尊許若見時」「空即緣起義」「性空與成立作所作無違」十四串皆在卷一。《菩提道次第廣論》据 B0067:「依緣起因」「若能定解芽等性空」「斷諸歧途」「於心最顯」在卷二十三;佛護論一段「若時了知緣起」「由智慧眼照見諸法無自性性」在卷二十;

核查全文

「他莫能轉」在卷十七,上文正作「謂依緣起於無自性生定解法及性空法現為因果之理當生定解他莫能轉」。惟一字须校:广论原文作「發慧光明除愚癡闇」,脚注作「暗」,系简体本换字,已于脚注内标出。负判则须收窄:Thurman 译《善說心髓》通检,《緣起讚》四支颂与广论上引三处确无对应译文(「net of bad views」「whatever is relative」「cannot be turned」「unshakable」「sprout…void」诸串皆零命中);但卷二十所引佛護論那一段,宗喀巴在《善說心髓》里另有转述,见书内第 308–309 页「how the illumination through the knowledge of relativity clears up the darkness of delusion, the intrinsic unreality of things is seen, and attraction and aversion do not arise」,其注六五标作「BMMV, I, TG, C, tsa, f. 155b2-156a1 (paraphrased by Tsong Khapa)」,次页并接「Therefore, (Buddhapalita) believes the actual holding to the truth of personal and objective things to be addictive misknowledge」,与广论「故佛護論師亦許增益諸法自性為十二支初支無明」同为一断。故原句「Thurman 该书通检未见」一语过宽,已改作「是同据佛護一处,而非同一段引文」,两个论点本身不出《善說心髓》一层则仍成立。

脚注所引《緣起讚》十四串之落点。卷首自题「緣起讚由說甚深緣起門中稱讚無上大師世尊善說心藏略名緣起讚共五十八頌宗喀巴大師造民國苾蒭法尊譯」,與注中所记全题、译者、一卷五十八颂三事俱合。同卷并见「說彼彼性空」「離此更何有」「希有善教誨」「若見返彼者」「空則用不成」「有用則無空」「墮苦惱險處」「此皆自性空」「緣此此果起」「二決定更互無障為助伴」(距 414)「尊許若見時」「空即緣起義」「性空與成立作所作無違」。另「真正认识空性者对缘起的显现更加清晰」一层出《菩提道次第廣論》(B0067)卷二十三,「依緣起因」在 B10n0067_p0766a18。