03-中观瑜伽行的综合

同页并记其初次入藏仅留四月，因阻力而建议迎请莲花生。（此与第三卷 12/01 桑耶一节互见。）　②〔世俗外境上与清辨的差异〕：寂护「although he is technically classified as a Mādhyamika, has such a strong affinity for the Yogācāra position of rejecting external objects that it is integrated into his own explanation of conventional truth」；并说「the rejection of external objects on a conventional level is seen as a step in the direction of the ultimate Madhyamaka view」——即寂护于世俗谛不许外境，与清辨于世俗许外境者分途，正文所述差异于此有本。　③〔综合〕同上条所引第九十二颂与「Yogācāra and Madhyamaka」之整合。

yā hi tāvad āgamārtham avadhārayati｜tataś cintāmayyā prajñayā nītaneyārthaṃ nirvedhayati｜tatas tayā niścitya bhūtam arthaṃ bhāvayen nābhūtam」（书内 508–509 页，）。三慧的三级结构与其先后次第，逐句俱在，且所出正是脚注著录的那一版（Part II，1958）。同段下文并言不由正解而修之害：「anyathā hi viparītasyāpi bhāvanād vicikitsāyāś cāvyapagamāt samyagjñānodayo na syāt｜tataś ca vyarthaiva bhāvanā syāt｜yathā tīrthikānām」，与正文书 114 行「没有地基的地方盖房子」一喻正相当，且末句以外道为比，比正文的比喻更带贬意。书内 514 页又云「tasya pratyakṣīkaraṇāya bhāvanāmayīṃ prajñām utpādayet｜bahuśrutādimātrakeṇa nārthaḥ pratyakṣo bhavati」，当正文书 94 行修慧转为现量一节。图齐本人叙此书缘起亦作「by the triple method of learning, reflection and meditation (t'os, bsam, sgom)」（书内 351 页，）。前记「三慧术语分散出现而未见集中论述」之所以下得早，一半即因只检了 Sopa/Hopkins 而未检此本讹形。判确：脚注三事（版本著录、止观双运、三慧递进）俱已坐实，脚注已补出梵文出处与页码。

yā hi tāvad āgamārtham avadhārayati｜tataś cintāmayyā prajñayā nītaneyārthaṃ nirvedhayati｜tatas tayā niścitya bhūtam arthaṃ bhāvayen nābhūtam」（书内 508–509 页，）。三慧的三级结构与其先后次第，逐句俱在，且所出正是脚注著录的那一版（Part II，1958）。同段下文并言不由正解而修之害：「anyathā hi viparītasyāpi bhāvanād vicikitsāyāś cāvyapagamāt samyagjñānodayo na syāt｜tataś ca vyarthaiva bhāvanā syāt｜yathā tīrthikānām」，与正文书 114 行「没有地基的地方盖房子」一喻正相当，且末句以外道为比，比正文的比喻更带贬意。书内 514 页又云「tasya pratyakṣīkaraṇāya bhāvanāmayīṃ prajñām utpādayet｜bahuśrutādimātrakeṇa nārthaḥ pratyakṣo bhavati」，当正文书 94 行修慧转为现量一节。图齐本人叙此书缘起亦作「by the triple method of learning, reflection and meditation (t'os, bsam, sgom)」（书内 351 页，）。前记「三慧术语分散出现而未见集中论述」之所以下得早，一半即因只检了 Sopa/Hopkins 而未检此本讹形。判确：脚注三事（版本著录、止观双运、三慧递进）俱已坐实，脚注已补出梵文出处与页码。